|
|
Back to Table of Contents
Improvement of Housing and Infrastructure Conditions in the Lower Mississippi Delta
© Housing Assistance Council, 2000
Permission is granted ONLY to nonprofit community-based
organizations to reproduce and/or adapt this document, and only for their
own use.
DELTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: SELF-HELP HOUSING PROJECT IN THE
HENRY ROSSER SUBDIVISION IN SUNFLOWER COUNTY,
MISSISSIPPI

The Delta Housing Development Corporation is a nonprofit housing
developer that provides single-family and multifamily homes to qualified
low-income families throughout Sunflower County. The organization,
incorporated since 1971, is an experienced housing developer. It has
developed or rehabilitated over 450 single-family homes, built and managed
181 units of rental housing, and helped more than 3,000 families with
weatherization aid. The organization utilizes a variety of funding sources
for its housing activity: it works with area banks for site acquisition
and construction financing; state and federal funds are used to subsidize
rental property and home mortgages. One of the most successful programs it
has undertaken is the provision of housing through Rural Development's
self-help housing program. This program requires the family who will
occupy the house to perform most of the labor to construct the unit. This
contribution of sweat equity helps bring down the cost of the house,
making it affordable to low-income families. Delta Housing is one of the
largest producers and oldest self-help housing developers in the
region.
One of the newer self-help projects undertaken by Delta Housing is the
construction of 32 single-family units as part of a 58-lots in the Henry
Rosser subdivision in Sunflower County. Financing for site development
comes through the Department of Housing and Urban Development's new
Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). The special feature of
this program is that 75 percent of the SHOP loan is forgivable, providing
the requirements of the program are fully met. This forgivable portion
will enable Delta Housing to set up its own revolving fund to undertake
additional self-help housing development in the area. This project
illustrates an innovative approach to addressing the financing challenges
faced by nonprofit housing developers in the Delta.
Overview of Sunflower County
Sunflower County reflects the population and poverty characteristics
observed in most parts of the Delta. The population decline that began in
the Delta in the 1940s continued through the 1980s.16 Sunflower County
reflects this trend as well. The county's population dropped by 5.7
percent from 34,844 in 1980 to 32,867 in 1990. As in other counties of the
Delta, the greatest decline, 11 percent, was among the white population.
In contrast, the black population declined by 2.5 percent. This decline continued through 1995 with the Census
Bureau reporting a population of 10,374 in 1995. The population decline in
Sunflower County is even more dramatic when compared to the overall
population change in all the Delta counties in Mississippi and the state
as a whole. (See Figure 3.1.)
Figure 3.1. Population Decline from 1980 to 1990 by race
As in many other parts of the Delta, this
out-migration has left behind a population largely comprised of
female-headed households, children, and the elderly. Consequently,
Sunflower County had high dependency ratios according to 1993 Census
figures: 53.7 for the white population and 71.3 for the black population.17
These ratios, while comparable to the rest of the Delta counties, are
significantly higher than the state as a whole. (See Figure 3.2.)
Figure 3.2. Dependency Ratio in Sunflower County by race, 1990.
Only about a third of the county’s population had completed high school
education according to the 1990 Census, with the education rate for blacks
half that for whites. Median household income was $14,431 according to
1990 Census figures. Families in the Delta earn an average weekly salary
of about $339 according to calculations made by the Mississippi Employment
Security Commission in 1995. Sunflower County also had an unemployment
rate at 13.1 in 1995, one of the highest in among all the Delta counties
in the state.18 This rate, at 15.6, is even higher among women.
Census data from 1990 revealed that 37.3 percent of the county’s
population lived below the poverty level. This was a slight increase from
the level reported in 1980, despite the decline in overall population.
Census figures from 1995 report 41.6 percent of the population living in
poverty, also an increase from previous levels. The percent of black
people below poverty was even higher at 52.5 percent in 1990, representing
almost no change from 1980 Census figures. The number of female-headed
families below poverty was a staggering 62 percent in 1990. Extreme levels
of poverty were also reflected among other vulnerable sections of the
population such as the elderly and children.
Agriculture has long been part of the economic engine in Sunflower
County. Visitors to the county are often greeted by the quintessential
Delta vista of a panoply of white undulating cotton fields dotted with the
bright red of mechanical cottonpickers. One has to look closely to pick
out the other world that persists and contrasts with this. This other
world is one of abject poverty, gross undereducation, extreme
unemployment, of dilapidated housing and nonexistent sewage systems, and
of dirt roads alongside new highways. Between these extremes is a reality
that Delta Housing has helped to build through its diligent efforts over
the past 28 years: a world of modest but decent housing, built by the
labor of the homeowners that now proudly reside in it.
Creating a Self-Help Housing Program
In 1970, 10 miles from the town of Indianola, seat of Sunflower County,
a tornado touched down and destroyed everything in its path, leaving
people homeless and with nowhere to go for assistance or shelter. Delta
Housing Development Corporation was born out of the need to help these
people rebuild their lives. The organization began to develop affordable
housing in 1972. In order to make the houses affordable for the low-income
population in the county, Delta Housing adopted the mutual self-help
housing program administered by the Rural Housing Service (RHS), formerly
known as the Farmers Home Administration.
RHS's mutual self-help program is modeled on the old "barn raising"
concept, involving neighbors helping each other to build their homes. Six
to ten families form a workgroup that performs volunteer, unskilled labor,
coupled with licensed contractors and supervision by Delta Housing to
complete the homes. This process truly serves to empower the poor through
homeownership. The beneficiary families contribute a fair amount of sweat
equity to the project and receive home loans from RHS, the lender of last
resort, since they are not able to access traditional financing. The units
constructed by Delta Housing are standard wood-frame units with brick
veneer, and are nearly 1,100 square feet in area.
Delta Housing began with the construction of 12 houses to accommodate
some of the tornado victims. Since then it has never looked back. Delta
Housing has successfully facilitated the construction of a number of
self-help housing subdivisions in Sunflower County. Delta Housing has
overcome a number of obstacles along the way, forged key relationships
with the county government, and become one of the most prolific and
reliable producers of affordable housing in the region. The Housing
Assistance Council has often been a partner in helping build affordable
housing, including for the first project the organization worked on,
through low interest pre-development loans. Other partners include local
banks such as Planters Bank.
The typical new, single-family, three-bedroom self-help house in
Sunflower County costs $55,000. This housing cost is best appreciated when
placed in the context of the prevalent local housing market. Local
realtors report that the lowest priced home of comparable quality sold in
a comparable location typically costs $68,000. This would be unaffordable
to families with annual incomes between $12,000 and $15,000. Consequently,
participating in the self-help construction program with Delta Housing
offers these families a unique opportunity to own their homes. As part of
the project, Delta Housing combines administration of the self-help
program with family credit counseling, preconstruction training, and
homeownership counseling. The training and counseling efforts are a
crucial ingredient to the success of the housing developments completed by
Delta Housing over the years.
Counseling ensures that the families participating in the program are
truly committed and ready for the hard labor they are required to
contribute. Counseling also helps prevent families from becoming
delinquent and losing their homes. In addition, the construction training
provides families with the skills necessary to maintain their homes in
good condition. The total package offered by Delta Housing promotes real
self-sufficiency for low-income families that is beyond the mere dollar
value.
At the time this study was conducted, Delta Housing's counseling was
offered only to self-help housing beneficiaries as part of the required
training for participation in this program. Expenses related to this
training were covered by the Section 523 Technical Assistance grant
received by the organization from RHS. Delta Housing is in the process of
establishing a more comprehensive counseling program because it believes
counseling can play a pivotal role in the success of its housing
programs.
The SHOP Program
One of Delta Housing's more recent projects, is the 58-lot Henry Rosser
subdivision in Indianola. This subdivision will be completed in two
phases. The first phase involves the construction of 26 units and work on
this phase was underway at the time of this study. Delta Housing was in
the process of developing the site for the next phase of 32 lots. It had
requested a loan of $241,500 from the Housing Assistance Council's SHOP
funds to cover the cost of site development. It had simultaneously
identified 16 families that were interested in participating in the
self-help program. These families were in the process of obtaining Section
502 loan approvals from RHS through their local Rural Development offices
to provide the permanent mortgages for the units. It is important for
these different aspects of a project to proceed simultaneously in order to
avoid cost overruns associated with delays in construction and final
closing of loans to the families. The 16 families will work in two groups
of eight each to build their homes through the mutual self-help program.
Each completed three-bedroom house will cost approximately $62,000. This
project is expected to proceed like all the other projects previously
undertaken by Delta Housing. The only difference is the potential SHOP
loan through HAC.
HAC's SHOP fund, established with funding of $4,822,125 from the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), provides capital to
nonprofit housing developers for land and infrastructure costs to a
maximum amount of $10,000 per unit. The funds are to be used to develop
decent housing for low-income households, using the self-help and/or
volunteer labor approach. The SHOP loans are at zero percent interest with
a 1 percent service fee charged to cover closing costs. Where the loan
amount does not exceed $200,000, only 25 percent of the loan must be
repaid if production goals are met. The remaining 75 percent may be
forgiven and be used by the group to establish its own revolving loan fund
for future site acquisition and development or as a grant to subsidize the
site cost to participating families.
Delta Housing is excited at the prospect of keeping 75 percent of the
SHOP loan for future use. It plans to set up its own revolving loan fund
with this money and will use the funds to cover costs of obtaining and
developing land for other subdivisions. Having ready money will help the
organization to move rapidly when it identifies a suitable tract of land
for development and will help reduce the cost of future developments.
Delta Housing plans to pass this reduction on to homebuyers.
Lessons Learned and Replicability
When Delta Housing first began, it had to overcome entrenched prejudice
on many fronts as it attempted to provide decent housing for the poor,
most of whom were African-American. At that time it was very difficult to
get an all white city or county government to support housing development
for the predominantly black low-income population. Then things changed.
Clanton Beamon, the executive director of Delta Housing, ran for and got
elected to the County Commission in 1988. He was the first African
American on the county board. Another staff member then got a seat on the
City Council, after contesting the seat three times. Having
African-American representation in these key decision-making bodies helped
tip the balance in favor of Delta Housing and the population it served.
When interviewed for this study, Clanton Beamon acknowledges that his
elected post does assist in the work of the organization he heads. As
County Supervisor he has been able to encourage the construction of
critically needed water systems in the rural parts of his county. However,
he adds that it was this very work that served as a springboard to help
him get elected in the first place. This illustrates how closely
intertwined politics can be with addressing the needs of the poor.
Sometimes it takes more than identifying financing sources to get a
project built in remote parts of the Delta. Beamon also serves as an
example to encourage other locally elected black officials to engage the
resources of their office more actively in alleviating the problems of
their community.
Delta Housing claims it also often had to dig in its heels to fight
racial prejudice within RHS. After years of establishing a stellar track
record and building strong relationships within the agency, Delta Housing
was able to overcome this barrier. It enjoyed many years of a good working
relationship with Rural Development. However, at the time this study was
conducted, matters seemed to have come full circle. The agency had
undergone some staff changes. Delta Housing was once again experiencing
problems with getting the local Rural Development office to approve the
loans it had packaged, and according to the nonprofit, racial bias seemed
to be at the root of these problems. At the time of this study, the group
had submitted 16 applications to the local Rural Development office but
only three had been approved. The housing group has filed a formal
complaint with the agency to address its grievance.19 The lesson here is to
keep fighting.
Similarly, even on the latest project undertaken by Delta Housing, the
Henry Rosser subdivision, the organization has had to resolve disputes
with the city on zoning issues. It has been battling with a seller for
over three years about title issues on another piece of property purchased
for affordable housing development. Delta Housing's experiences
demonstrate that there is never room for complacency. There are always new
challenges to overcome with each new project. However, an organization
that has developed experience and capacity is able to weather these
challenges with relative ease. Unfortunately, a smaller, less experienced
group may find not have the resources to survive the developmental delays
each new obstacle can pose.
In the years since Delta Housing first began working in the field of
affordable housing, it has added the development of rental housing (using
RHS's Section 515 program) and the rehabilitation of existing housing to
its portfolio of achievements. This range of programs helps Delta Housing
serve the needs of a broad spectrum of clientele, including those who are
not yet ready for homeownership.
Finally, Delta Housing's housing development efforts effectively
demonstrate how sweat equity can contribute towards lowering the cost of
housing to make it affordable to low-income families. Sweat equity is a
creative form of financing for developing affordable housing in the Delta
where alternate sources of credit are hard to obtain. Rural Development's
self-help housing program is used effectively all over rural America. Its
replicability is well documented. Despite this, only a few groups in the
Delta have developed a self-help housing program to serve their target
area. More groups could explore the feasibility of utilizing the concepts
embodied in this program to meet the Delta’s affordable housing
needs.
Back to Table of Contents
On to Next Section
|