Back to Main Text

McKinney Act Programs in Nonmetro Areas:
How Far do They Reach?
Part One: Distribution of Funds 1987-1991

© Housing Assistance Council, 2000

Permission is granted ONLY to nonprofit community-based organizations to reproduce and/or adapt this document, and only for their own use.


---

TABLES  8 - 13

---


Table 8.  Permanent Housing Program Nonmetro Grant Recipients Location Listing

FY	City	County	Urban Rural Code	State	Grant Amount
1988	Decatur	Morgan	4	Alabama	$101,500
	Prescott	Yavapai	4	Arizona	$99,500
	Idaho Falls	Bonneville	5	Idaho	$100,000
	Twin Falls	Twin Falls	5	Idaho	$32,696
	Pocatello	Bannock	5	Idaho	$15,000
	Scotts Bluff	Scotts Bluff	5	Nebraska	$130,000
	Morgantown	Monongalia	5	West Virginia	$43,312
	Moscow	Latah	7	Idaho	$52,142
	Summersville	Nicholas	7	West Virginia	$56,250
	Petersburg	Grant	9	West Virginia	$35,000
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$665,400
Percent of National Funding for the Year					10%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$66,540
FY	City	County	Urban Rural Code	State	Grant Amount
1989	Grand Junction	Mesa	5	Colorado	$103,516
	New Hampshire	Merrimack	4	New Hampshire	$147,146
	Portsmouth	Scioto	4	Ohio	$89,948
	Middletown	Newport	4	Rhode Island	$123,890
	Wiscasset	Lincoln	9	Maine	$132,238
	Laconia	Belknap	6	New Hampshire	$2,335
	Montpelier	Washington	6	Vermont	$158,154
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$757,227
Percent of National Funding for the Year					8%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$108,175
FY	City	County	Urban Rural Code	State	Grant Amount
1990	Kenai	Kenai Peninsula	6	Alaska	$150,270
	Gainsville	Hall	6	Georgia	$262,275
	Frankfort	Franklin	4	Kentucky	$13,710
	Frankfort	Franklin	4	Kentucky	$13,710
	Owosso	Shiawassee	4	Michigan	$115,649
	Concord	Merrimack	4	New Hampshire	$5,486
	Columbus	Cherokee	6	Kansas	$171,480
	Fredericksburg	Mecklenburg	6	Virginia	$147,000
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$879,580
Percent of National Funding for the Year					6%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$109,948
FY	City	County	Urban Rural Code	State	Grant Amount
1991	York	York	4	Maine	$942,543
	Kingston	Ulster	4	New York	$679,767
	Columbiana County	Columbiana	4	Ohio	$531,888
	Seymour	Jackson	7	Indiana	$213,152
	Ellensburg	Kittitas	6	Washington	$124,375
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$2,491,725
Percent of National Funding for the Year					5%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$498,345
TOTAL NONMETRO FUNDING FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					$4,793,932
PERCENT OF NATIONAL FUNDING FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					6%
AVERAGE NONMETRO GRANT FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					$159,798

---


Table 9. SAFAH Program Distribution Summary for Fiscal Years 1987 - 1991*




	Total Grants/Funds Distributed	Received in Metro Counties	%(1)	RECEIVED IN NONMETRO COUNTIES
				Total Nonmetro	%(1)	With 20,000+ Urban Pop.	%(1)	With 2,500-19,999 Urban Pop.(2)	%(1)	With <2,500 Urban Pop.(2)	%(1)
Number of Grantees	120	100	83	20	17	9	8	10	8	1	1
Grant Totals	$36,707,514	$34,207,099	93	$2,500,415	7	$1,489,749	4	$642,652	2	$368,014	1
Average Grant	$305,896	$342,071	112	$125,021	41	$165,528	54	$64,265	21	$368,014	120
Maximum	$1,000,000	$1,000,000	100	$422,741	42	$422,741	42	$162,990	16	$368,014	37
Minimum	$10,799	$22,673	210	$10,799	100	$46,060	427	$10,799	100	$368,014	3,408

     Notes
* The SAFAH program was not funded in 1988 and 1989.
(1) Percentages for number of grantees, grant totals, average grants, maximum grants and minimum grants are percent of total grants/funds distributed among all metro-nonmetro categories. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number and are less than 1/2 of 1 percent if shown as zero.
(2) Nonmetro rural counties.

---


Table 10.  SAFAH Program Nonmetro Grant Recipients Location Listing




FY	City	County	Urban Rural Code	State	Grant Amount
1987	Pocahontas	Randolph	7	Arkansas	$14,583
	Ukiah	Mendocino	5	California	$422,741
	Pocatello	Bannock	5	Idaho	$46,060
	Butler	Butler	4	Pennsylvania	$100,000
	Meadville	Crawford	4	Pennsylvania	$100,000
	Huntingdon	Huntingdon	6	Pennsylvania	$100,000
	Aberdeen	Brown	5	South Dakota	$113,190
	Jackson	Madison	5	Tennessee	$74,100
	Rutland	Rutland	7	Vermont	$25,625
	Rockingham	Windham	7	Vermont	$10,799
	Burlington	Windham	7	Vermont	$126,867
	Hartford	Windsor	7	Vermont	$12,093
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$1,146,058
Percent of National Funding for the Year					8%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$95,505
FY	City	County	Urban Rural Code	State	Grant Amount
1990	Cullman	Cullman	6	Alabama	$46,644
	Lewiston	Nez Perce	5	Idaho	$301,063
	Indian Lake	Hamilton	8	New York	$368,014
	Fremont	Sandusky	4	Ohio	$196,500
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$912,221
Percent of National Funding for the Year					8%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$228,055
1991	Coldwater	Branch	6	Michigan	$85,951
	Traverse City	Grand Traverse	7	Michigan	$162,990
	Bemidji	Beltrami	7	Minnesota	$57,100
	Moses Lake	Grant	5	Washington	$136,095
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$442,136
Percent of National Funding for the Year					4%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$110,534
TOTAL NONMETRO FUNDING FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					$2,500,415
PERCENT OF NATIONAL FUNDING FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					7%
AVERAGE NONMETRO GRANT FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					$125,021

---


Table 11.  Section 8 SRO Program Distribution Summary for Fiscal Years 1988-1991




	Total Grants/Funds Distributed	Received in Metro Counties	%(1)	RECEIVED IN NONMETRO COUNTIES
				Total Nonmetro	%(1)	With 20,000+ Urban Pop.	%(1)	With 2,500-19,999 Urban Pop.(2)	%(1)	With <2,500 Urban Pop.(2)	%(1)
Number of Grantees	119	112	94	7	6	4	3	3	3	0	0
Grant Totals	$256,084,760	$248,196,920	97	$7,887,840	3	$4,576,800	2	$3,311,040	1	0	0
Average Grant	$2,151,973	$2,216,044	103	$1,126,834	52	$1,144,200	53	$1,103,680	51	NA	NA
Maximum	$10,961,880	$10,961,880	100	$2,890,800	26	$2,890,800	26	$2,544,000	23	NA	NA
Minimum	$221,040	$253,300	115	$221,040	100	$221,040	100	$342,720	155	NA	NA
Total Units	6,079	5,833	96	246	4	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Average Number of Units per Grant	51	52	102	35	69	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Average Cost per Unit	$42,126	$42,550	101	$32,064	76	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA

    Notes.
(1) Percentages for number of grantees, grant totals, average grants, maximum grants, minimum grants, numbers of units, average number of units and average cost per unit are percent of total grants/funds distributed among all metro-nonmetro categories. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number and are less than 1/2 of 1 percent if shown as zero.
(2) Nonmetro rural counties

---


Table 12.  Section 8 SRO Program Nonmetro Grant Recipients Location Listing




FY	City	County	Urban Rural Code	State	Grant Amount
1988	Newport	Newport	4	Rhode Island	$2,890,800
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$2,890,800
Percent of National Funding for the Year					8%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$2,890,800
1989	Flagstaff	Coconino	5	Arizona	$221,040
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$221,040
Percent of National Funding for the Year					1%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$221,040
1990	Batesville	Independence	7	Arkansas	$2,544,000
	Twin Falls	Twin Falls	5	Idaho	$789,120
	Stutsman Co.	Stutsman	7	North Dakota	$342,720
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$3,675,840
Percent of National Funding for the Year					1%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$1,225,280
1991	Mountain Home	Baxter	7	Arkansas	$424,320
	Olean	Cattaraugus	4	New York	$675,840
Total Nonmetro Funding for the Year					$1,100,160
Percent of National Funding for the Year					1%
Average Nonmetro Grant for the Year					$550,080
TOTAL NONMETRO FUNDING FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					$7,887,840
PERCENT OF NATIONAL FUNDING FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					3%
AVERAGE NONMETRO GRANT FOR ALL STUDY YEARS					$1,126,834




---




Table 13.  EHP Sample Distribution Summary for Fiscal Year 1990




	Total Grants/Funds Distributed	Received in Metro Counties	%(1)	RECEIVED IN NONMETRO COUNTIES
				Total Nonmetro	%(1)	With 20,000+ Urban Pop.	%(1)	With 2,500- 19,999 Urban Pop. (2)	%(1)	With <2,500 Urban Pop. (2)	%(1)
Number of Grantees	691	390	56	301	44	109	16	168	24	24	3
Grant Totals	$11,583,669	$8,685,886	75	$2,897,783	25	$1,270,783	11	$1,439,629	12	$187,371	2

    Notes.
* Number of grantees information is based on data provided by 36 states. Grant totals are based on data provided by 26 states.
(1) Percentages for number of grantees and grant totals are percent of total grants/funds distributed among all metro-nonmetro categories. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number and are less than 1/2 of 1 percent if shown as zero.
(2) Nonmetro rural counties.

On to Tables 14-20

Back to Tables 1-7

Back to Main Text

Back to Table of Contents